Legal Opinion

Dean v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 19, 2005No. COA04-735PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Judge.

On 12 January 2004, the trial court granted plaintiffs motion for directed verdict and dismissed plaintiffs complaint for summary ejectment. Specifically, the trial court concluded as a matter of law that defendant surrendered the leasehold to plaintiff, that the action for summary ejectment is now moot, and that “despite the findings of fact, . . . defendant did not allege specific enough damages in his counterclaim for the court to grant relief.” Defendant now appeals.

In March 2003, plaintiff and defendant entered into an oral lease agreement to rent a mobile home (“the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Spartan Leasing Inc. v. PollardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Love v. PressleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. Mitchell v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Cohen v. McLawhornCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  2. Hailey v. Auto-Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. Ray v. GreerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Greenshields, Inc. v. Travelers Prop. Cas. Co. of Am.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  5. Buckner v. TigerSwan, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API