Legal Opinion

Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1972No. 7226DC789PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Judge.

At the close of plaintiff’s evidence and again at the close of all of the evidence defendant moved for a directed verdict in its favor. Denial of these motions is the subject of the exceptions included in appellant’s first assignment of error.

A motion for directed verdict under Rule 50(a) of the Rules of Civil Procedure is appropriate when trial is held before a jury. This case was1 tried by the judge without a jury. The appropriate motion in such case is for involuntary dismissal under Rule 41(b). The distinction is more than one of mere nomenclature, as a different test is to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Bryant v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Clott v. GREYHOUND LINES, INCORPORATEDSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Merchant v. . LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Jordan v. EASTERN TRANSIT & STORAGE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tanglewood Land Co., Inc. v. WoodCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Higgins v. BUILDERS AND FINANCE INCORPORATEDCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Chase Group v. Fisher, Clinard & CornwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
  4. Hill v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  5. Hobson Const. Co., Inc. v. Hajoca Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API