Legal Opinion

Wells v. STURDIVANT LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 31, 1971No. 7118DC117PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

Defendant contends in its assignments of error numbered 1 and 3 that the trial judge committed error in questioning the plaintiff’s witness Freeman and the defendant’s witness Price concerning collection of premiums on other policies sold by Freeman and listed on the weekly application record of Freeman. The questions asked by the judge do not appear in the record. The answers of the witnesses appear to be made in a proper area of investigation in this case. It is well-established law in North Carolina that the judge may ask a witness clarifying questions. These…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BlackwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Grier v. Mutual Life Insurance Co. of New YorkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  4. Waters v. Security Life & Annuity Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  5. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pegram-West, Inc. v. Hiatt Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  3. McNeely v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. Rogers v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Mills v. Koscot Interplanetary, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API