Legal Opinion

Molodyh v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 12, 1986No. 149,522; CA A33853PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In this action on a fire insurance policy, plaintiff, the insured, appeals from a judgment for defendants, the insurers, following the granting of defendants’ motion for summary judgment. He contends that ORS 743.648 unconstitutionally deprives him of his right to jury trial as guaranteed by Article I, section 17, of the Oregon Constitution. The statute provides:

“A fire insurance policy shall contain a provision as follows: ‘In case the insured and this company shall fail to agree as to the actual cash value or the amount of loss, then, on the written demand of either, each shall select a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hardware Dealers Mutual Fire Insurance v. Glidden Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. California State Automobile Ass'n Inter-Insurance Bureau v. MaloneySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. Evanhoff v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1915
  4. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Moore Mill & Lumber Co. v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1959

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Molodyh v. Truck Insurance ExchangeOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Lind v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  3. Cady v. Allstate InsuranceIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Mittendorf v. Stone Lumber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1994
  5. Charlee's Candies, LLC v. Woodburn Premium Outlets, LLCDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API