Legal Opinion

Molodyh v. Truck Insurance Exchange

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1987No. TC 149,522; CA A33853; SC S32789PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarson, J.

This case involves an action on a fire insurance policy. We are asked to determine whether ORS 743.648, which sets forth an appraisal procedure 1 in the event of a dispute over the actual cash value or the amount of the loss, violates Article I, section 17, of the Oregon Constitution 2 because it deprives an insured of the right to a jury trial.

The facts are not disputed. Plaintiff owned property which was damaged by fire on February 7,1983. The property was insured by defendants under a multi-risk policy which included standard fire coverage. Plaintiff submitted a proof of loss, claiming…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring CarOregon Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Cornelison v. SeaboldOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Tribou & McPhee v. StrowbridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Stemmer v. Scottish InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Vancil v. PoulsonOregon Supreme Court · 1964

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Lakin v. Senco Products, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Greist v. PhillipsOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Vannatta v. KeislingOregon Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Horton v. Oregon Health & Science UniversityOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API