Legal Opinion

State v. Franklin

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1972No. 7229SC776PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS, Judge.

Each defendant has assigned as error the trial judge’s denial of his motions for directed verdict at the close of the State’s evidence and at the close of all the evidence. A motion for a directed verdict of not guilty like the motion of nonsuit challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to go to the jury. State v. Woodlief, 2 N.C. App. 495, 163 S.E. 2d 407 (1968). Also it is established in North Carolina that upon a motion for nonsuit in a criminal case, the evidence must be interpreted in the light most favorable to the State, giving the State the benefit of all reasonable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. FrazierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  3. State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. WoodliefCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  5. State v. JettonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Matter of DulaneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. In Re OwensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  3. Matter of AshbyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. State v. SuittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. State v. LedfordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API