Legal Opinion

Matter of Dulaney

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 7, 1985No. 841DC717PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WHICHARD, Judge.

The juvenile contends the court erred in denying her motions to dismiss. We agree.

The essential elements of felonious possession of stolen property are: (1) possession of personal property, (2) valued at more than $400.00, (3) which has been stolen, (4) the possessor knowing or having reasonable grounds to believe the property was stolen, and (5) the possessor acting with a dishonest purpose. G.S. 14-71.1, -72; State v. Perry, 305 N.C. 225, 233, 287 S.E. 2d 810, 815 (1982). One has possession of stolen property when one has both the power and intent to control its disposition…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  4. State v. BridgersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Matter of MeautCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In Re BassCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  2. People v. LandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  3. In Re HeilCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. McCoySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  5. In Re HartsockCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API