State v. Frazier
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Contrary to Rule 19(2) of this Court, two separate transcripts were docketed. The trial was upon a joint indictment of both defendants for the same offense. A single transcript should have been docketed. Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 254 N.C. 783, 797; Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co., 224 N.C. 211, 29 S.E. 2d 740; S. v. Jackson, 226 N.C. 760, 40 S.E. 2d 417; Hoke v. Greyhound Corp., 227 N.C. 412, 42 S.E. 2d 593.
The appeals must be considered separately. The court’s charge to the jury is not included in the transcript docketed by Givens, his sole assignment of error being his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. StephensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Conley Ex Rel. Conley v. Pearce-Young-Angel Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
- Hoke v. Atlantic Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1947
- State v. . HolbrookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
- State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. GonzalezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.