Legal Opinion

State v. Bridgers

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 20, 1966No. 496PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

The defendant’s motion to set aside the verdict on the ground that it is contrary to the weight of the evidence was addressed to the discretion of the trial court and is not reviewable upon appeal. State v. Wagstaff, 219 N.C. 15, 12 S.E. 2d 657; Strong, N. C. Index, Criminal Law, § 126.

There was no error in the denial of the motions for nonsuit and the motion for a directed verdict of not guilty. Upon such motion the evidence must be interpreted in the light most favorable to the State, and all reasonable inferences favorable to the State must be drawn therefrom. State v. Thompson, 256 N.C.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BrutonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. State v. . WagstaffSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. State v. StevensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. State v. FlynnSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. WitherspoonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. PorthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  5. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API