Legal Opinion

State v. Cotten

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 18, 1968No. 68SC163PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorris, J.

At the very outset we find it necessary to note that defendant has failed to comply with the rules of this Court. Defendant’s appeal is submitted under Rule 19(d) (2) which permits the filing of the complete stenographic transcript of the evidence in the trial tribunal in lieu of setting out the evidence in narrative form. Defendant has caused the stenographic transcript to be filed. However, he has failed to include in an appendix to his brief, “in succinct language with respect to those witnesses whose testimony is deemed to be pertinent to the questions raised on appeal, what he says the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Hartley v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. State v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1878
  5. Travis v. DuckworthSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. AverySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. BoomerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  3. State v. ThompkinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  4. State v. RobinetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. OdomCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API