Richmond v. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
FORD ELLIOTT, J.:
¶ 1 This case is before us on remand from our supreme court. On December 27, 2001, a three-judge panel of this court, with one judge dissenting, filed an opinion reversing an order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lehigh County.1 The Common Pleas Court order affirmed a 2-1 decision by a board of arbitrators finding in favor of Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company (“insurer”). This court reversed, finding that certain policy provisions in insurer’s car insurance policy violated the public policy of this Commonwealth, and also finding some of the policy’s…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Eichelman v. Nationwide InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- F.J. Busse Co. v. Sheila Zipporah, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Vogt v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Hartford Insurance v. O'MaraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- O'HARA v. First Liberty Ins. Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Nationwide Assurance Co. v. EasleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.