Legal Opinion

Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2001No. 1 WAP 2001, 2 WAP 2001PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NEWMAN, Justice.

This appeal involves multiple underinsured motorist (hereinafter “UIM”) claims in two independent cases. The plaintiffs commenced their claims against their insurers after they were unable to obtain full recoveries from the government entities that caused their injuries because of the statutory limits on the amount of damages that a Commonwealth or local agency may be required to pay pursuant to Sections 8528 and 8549 of the Judicial Code, 42 Pa.C.S §§ 8528 and 8549, respectively. The issue in this case is whether the Appellant-insurers’ policy exclusion of government…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hall v. Amica Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Philadelphia Housing Authority v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Karlson v. City of Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
  5. Young v. Greater Portland Transit DistrictSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. Giulian v. Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Commonwealth v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  5. Malt Beverages Distributors Ass'n v. Pennsylvania Liquor Control BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API