Legal Opinion

Nationwide Assurance Co. v. Easley

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 10, 2008No. 1278 WDA 2006PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

POPOVICH, J.:

¶ 1 Appellant Calvin Easley appeals the grant of summary judgment to Appellee Nationwide Assurance Company on the basis that the trial court erred in construing exclusion clauses within an automobile insurance policy issued by Appellee to deny Appellant’s claim for injuries sustained while operating a taxi. We affirm.

¶2 The pertinent facts are not in dispute. On the 19th day of August, 2001, Appellant sustained personal injuries in an automobile accident while operating a taxi owned by the Yellow Cab Company of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Every day, Ap pellant paid a…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Kmonk-Sullivan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Burstein v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. ColbertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Prudential Property & Casualty Insurance v. SartnoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Brink v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Dixon v. GEICOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  3. Dixon v. GEICOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  4. Dixon v. GEICOSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. Gerhardt v. MID-CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API