Legal Opinion
State v. Vereb
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided May 7, 2002No. C8-01-1055PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
After the district court denied his pretrial suppression motion, appellant entered into a Lothenbach stipulation and, based upon the police reports, was found guilty by the court of conspiracy to manufacture methamphetamine, a first-degree controlled substance crime, and possession of more than six grams of methamphetamine, a second-degree controlled substance crime. Minn.Stat. §§ 152.021, subd. 2a, 022, subd. 2(1), .96, subd. 1 (2000). 1 Pursuant to the parties’ agreement, the district court merged the two counts for sentencing and imposed a 72-month sentence, which…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Marben v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. CarlsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. BulingtonIndiana Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. OdomCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2003
- State v. BergersonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Ex Parte ShaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.