State v. George
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARDEBRING, Justice.
This criminal case raises several issues under the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and the comparable provision in the Minnesota Constitution. We are asked to determine whether there was an objective legal basis for the initial traffic stop and whether, assuming the stop was valid, there was consent for the ensuing search. Because we conclude that there was no objective legal basis for the stop and no consent to the search, we reverse the court of appeals and vacate the conviction.
Appellant Thomas Otto George pleaded guilty to illegal possession of a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. SokolowSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by77 opinions
- State v. HarrisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State of Iowa v. Scottize Danyelle BrownSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
- State v. AskeroothSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. DiedeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.