Legal Opinion
State v. Carlson
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided December 1, 2005No. 22775-8-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*591¶1
Schultheis, J.
— Jeffrey Otto Carlson and Joey Owens entered a rural store. Each separately bought an unremarkable amount of a different product that can be lawfully possessed and purchased. The store’s manager knew that when mixed together and also combined with a number of other substances, the two products purchased by Mr. Carlson and Mr. Owens — muriatic acid and denatured alcohol — could be used to make methamphetamine. The manager called police. An officer stopped the vehicle in which Mr. Carlson and Mr. Owens were then traveling and ultimately discovered pseudoephedrine.
¶2 Mr. Carlson…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- State v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. KennedyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
- State v. Keller-DeenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007