Legal Opinion
State v. Bergerson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 15, 2003No. C2-02-932PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Appealing from his conviction of fifth-degree controlled substance crime, appellant Daniel Bergerson argues that police lacked reasonable, articulable suspicion to stop his vehicle after driving away from a hardware store in which the owner had reported Bergerson’s purchase of two commonly sold items with lawful uses that also can be used along with other items to manufacture methamphetamine. Berger-son also argues that the evidence seized should be suppressed as fruit of the illegal seizure. We reverse.
FACTS
On November 14, 2000, the owner of a hardware store in Cambridge…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Ex Parte ShaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 2004
- State of Minnesota v. Roosevelt HunterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2018
- State v. Maldonado-ArreagaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.