Legal Opinion

Hughes Fawcett, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided June 26, 1952No. C. D. 1434PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Laweence, Judge:

This controversy concerns the proper dutiable classification of certain imported heel serts, so-called, together with nails and templates, packed in printed paper envelopes.

*2It is stated in the brief of defendant that “The envelope, the container of the merchandise, was by virtue of paragraph 1408, Tariff Act of 1930, assessed with duty (45%) at the rate applicable to the contents. The serts, nails and templates were classified as entireties and duty was assessed at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397, Tariff Act of 1930, as articles not specially provided for,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Altman & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Borgfeldt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  4. W. A. Force & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950
  5. Wm. Adams, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. John P. Herber & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953
  2. Silvine Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Consolidated Sewing Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  5. Hirschberg v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API