Legal Opinion

Hirschberg v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided March 5, 1953No. C. D. 1505PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EKWall, Judge:

This is a protest against the collector’s decision liquidating an entry and assessing duty on a stallion, known as “Loyola,” imported from Mexico on December 22,1947. The various ■claims, hereinafter discussed, relate to the legality of the appraisement, the liquidation, and the collector’s refusal to permit an amendment of the entry.

The following facts in connection with the importation and the •subsequent actions of customs officials were brought out by the evidence presented at the trial. Prior to the importation of the stallion, ;an agreement was entered into on or about…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hughes Fawcett, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  2. Waddell v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Pitman Publishing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Hopkins v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carlyle Investment Management Group, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2015
  2. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  4. United States v. HirschbergCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API