Legal Opinion

John P. Herber & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided April 23, 1953No. C. D. 1519PublishedCited by 130 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OlIvee, Chief Judge:

This case relates to prismatic binoculars and plush-lined leather carrying cases with straps. The merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate of 30 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 228 (a), Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, for prism-binoculars, frames and mountings therefor, and parts thereof, finished or unfinished.

The deputy collector of customs at the port of entry, Seattle, who supervised the liquidation of the entry in question and the review of the protest now before us, testified…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. HohnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  2. United States v. GarramoneCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  3. Hughes Fawcett, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  4. Meyer v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. Pitman Publishing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by130 opinions

  1. Holmes v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. F. B. Vandegrift & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  3. Consolidated Sewing Machine Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  4. Paillard, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  5. E. Leitz, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956

125 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API