Legal Opinion

Borgfeldt & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 1, 1921No. 2083PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 44018.

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Decorated porcelain toy tea sets and paper trays, imported at the port of Seattle, Wash., were classified by the collector of customs as entireties and assessed for duty at 55 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 80 of the tariff act of 1913, as toys in chief value of decorated porcelain. The part of paragraph 80 under which the importation was assessed, reads as follows:

Par. 80. China and porcelain ware * * * toys * * * and all other articles composed wholly or in chief value of such ware, if * * * painted * * * or decorated in any manner and manufactures in chief value of such ware not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
  2. Cattus v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  3. Illfelder v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
  4. United States v. ScheuerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. United States v. Willoughby Camera Stores, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
  2. Hughes Fawcett, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Trans Atlantic Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1955
  4. Selsi Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
  5. W. A. Force & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1950

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API