Legal Opinion

Hoertkorn v. Sullivan

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 1, 1944No. Civ. 12769PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Plaintiffs were formerly members of the San Francisco Police Department and were removed therefrom in 1936 after trial on charges of misconduct before the local police commission. In November, 1943, they filed a petition with the Police Commission asking that body to review the case and reinstate each to his former rank and position. The commission determined that it was beyond its jurisdiction to hear the matter on the ground that there was no law authorizing it to rehear the former proceedings, or to reinstate petitioners. Plaintiffs then filed a writ of mandate praying that an order be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Heap v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Petersen v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  4. Cook v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Pacheco v. ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Aylward v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Humbert v. Castro Valley County Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Groditsky v. PinckneySupreme Court of Colorado · 1983
  4. Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  5. Kendall v. City of Fort PierceDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API