Legal Opinion
Aylward v. State Board of Chiropractic Examiners
California Supreme Court
Decided May 6, 1948No. Sac. 5822PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGibson, C. J.
Petitioners were licensed to practice chiropractic by the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners after passing special examinations, held pursuant to a resolution adopted in 1942, in which nearly all of the applicants were examined individually in separate written tests prepared, given, and graded by one board member. In 1943, the board held a hearing on charges that the method of conducting the examinations violated the statutes and that some of. the licensees did not possess the required educational qualifications. The board found that no cause for revocation had been shown. In 1944, a new…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Matson Terminals, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Heap v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Hughes v. Board of Architectural ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hollywood Circle, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Unemployment Insurance Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Ferdig v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.