Legal Opinion

Groditsky v. Pinckney

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 4, 1983No. 82SA171, 82SA172PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEIGHBORS, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal of the decision made by the district court sustaining petitions for the recall of the respondents and upholding the constitutionality of the statutory scheme providing for the recall of special district directors. 1 We affirm.

I

On March 5, 1982, petitions demanding the recall of Darrell Pinckney and Thomas Young (respondents) from their positions as directors of the Bancroft Fire Protection District were filed in the Jefferson County District Court pursuant to section 32-1-906, C.R.S.1973 (1982 Supp.). The grounds for recall alleged in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Brooks v. ZabkaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  2. People v. SneedSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Coffey v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. State Ex Rel. Burns v. Linn, District JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  5. Dunham v. ArderySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dempsey v. RomerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Passarelli v. SchoettlerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. DeKalb County School District v. Georgia State Board of EducationSupreme Court of Georgia · 2013
  4. Lockett v. GarrettColorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Hayes v. SpaldingSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API