Legal Opinion
Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate Commission
California Supreme Court
Decided January 31, 1941No. L. A. 17286PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.
In this original proceeding, the petitioner, Olive Proration Program Committee for Olive Proration Zone No. 1, seeks a peremptory writ of mandate directing the Agricultural Prorate Advisory Commission and William B. Parker, Director of Agriculture, as successors of the Agricultural Prorate Commission (Stats. 1939, chap. 894; Deering’s Gen. Laws, 1937 Ed., vol. 1, Act 143a), to annul two orders made by the latter body. These orders, dated July 26 and August 7, 1939, respectively, purport to terminate the olive proration program theretofore established.
Olive Proration Zone No. 1, embracing the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Field v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- J. W. Hampton, Jr., & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. GrimaudSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Empire Star Mines Co. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hollywood Circle, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage ControlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Parker v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Bonnell v. Medical Bd. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.