Legal Opinion
Pacheco v. Clark
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 11, 1941No. Civ. 6473PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HELD, J., pro tem.
Appellant, on August 15, 1929, acquired civil service status as a Captain in the California Highway Patrol, and was assigned for duty to the county of Santa Clara. On February 19, 1932, he was dismissed from the service, which dismissal he contends was accomplished illegally and through fraudulent means. From a judgment denying him a peremptory writ of mandate directing the Director of the Motor Vehicle Department and the Chief of the California Highway Patrol to restore him to his former position he appeals.
On December 22, 1931, one Thomas O’Brien filed with the Department…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Hayman v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- Heap v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Brown v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Raymond v. ChristianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Conti v. Board of Civil Service CommissionersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Aylward v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Koehn v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Claude Fisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.