Legal Opinion

Heap v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1936No. L. A. 15470PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

A hearing was granted in this case after decision by the District Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, Division One. After further consideration, we adopt the following opinion of said court as part of the opinion of this court:

“Respondents’ demurrer to appellant’s petition for a writ of mandate was sustained without leave to amend, and the appeal is from the judgment subsequently entered against petitioner. The petition alleges that the appellant, a civil service employee in the bureau of engineering of respondent city, was discharged from his position, and that he thereupon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane v. United States Ex Rel. MickadietSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Petersen v. Civil Service BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Cook v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Krohn v. Board of Water & Power CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Olive Proration Program Committee v. Agricultural Prorate CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Bonnell v. Medical Bd. of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Chas. L. Harney, Inc. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Aylward v. State Board of Chiropractic ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs Reservation of Oregon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API