Legal Opinion

Albachten v. MILLER ET UX

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1959PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.

(Pro Tempore)

Plaintiff appeals from a decree denying specific performance of an option contract for the sale of real property in Jackson County, Oregon. The controversy involves interpretation of clauses in the option, reading: The optionors give the optionee “the exclusive right and option to purchase, on October 1, 1955, but not prior thereto, for the sum of TEN THOUSAND ($10,000.00) DOLLABS cash, the real property and leases described as follows, to wit: * * * In the event optionee shall decide to exercise this option on October 1, 1955, she shall give the optionors not less than thirty…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HammelsyOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Horgan v. RussellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Breen v. MayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Snead v. WoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Killam v. TenneyOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Robinson v. Martel Enterprises, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Cillessen v. Kona CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Davidson v. WyattOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Gropp v. LottonMontana Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API