Legal Opinion

Killam v. Tenney

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1961PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is an action to recover a real estate broker’s commission. In a trial before the court without a jury the court entered a judgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $10,000 as an agreed commission and $1,750 attorneys’ fee. Defendant appeals.

The plaintiff Graham Killam, dba Graham Killam Co., is a licensed real estate broker in the city of Portland, Oregon. The defendant G. U. Tenney, dba West Coast Pictures, was the owner of real property in Portland improved by a building in which the business referred to was conducted. On December 9,1958, the defendant signed a listing agreement by…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. House v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Breen v. MayneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  3. Strong v. MooreOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Northern Illinois Coal Corp. v. CryderIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Turner v. McCormickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Wagner v. Rainier Manufacturing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Loose v. BrubacherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  3. Steele v. NorthupSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  4. Figge v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  5. Finnell v. BrombergNevada Supreme Court · 1963

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API