Legal Opinion

State v. Hammelsy

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1908PublishedCited by 62 opinions

From Jackson: Hiero K. Hanna, Judge. The respondent, G. L. Hammelsy, was indicted for obtaining money by false pretenses, and the State appeals from a judgment sustaining a demurrer to the indictment.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Bean

The defendant was indicted for obtaining money by false pretenses, the false pretense being a check,' drawn by himself to his order on a bank, which he indorsed, and fraudulently and feloniously presented and delivered to one Orr, with intent to defraud, knowing at the time that he had no funds in the bank for payment of such check, and that it was worthless. A demurrer to the indictment was sustained, on the ground that it does not allege that any false or deceitful means were used by defendant to induce Orr to accept the check, such as representing that he had money or credit at the bank,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WasservogleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Commonwealth v. BeckettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  4. People v. DonaldsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by62 opinions

  1. Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Miami Corporation v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1936
  3. Pacific Elevator Co. v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  4. State Ex Rel. State Game Commission v. Red River Valley Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  5. State v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1919

57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API