Legal Opinion

Cillessen v. Kona Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1964No. 7308, 7309PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHAVEZ, Justice.

This is a consolidated appeal from the final judgment in two cases consolidated for trial without a jury.

Cause No. 7308 is an action for debt by plaintiffs-cross-appellees, Cillessen and Rutherford, co-partners, against Kona Company, a corporation, and Hamilton Simonds, defendants-cross-appellants.

Cause No. 7309 is an action by the same plaintiffs-appellants against Hamilton Simonds, defendant-appellee, praying for specific performance, i. e., that Simonds be required to convey an interest in the property described in the agreement entered into between the parties.

On July 13,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lake Shore Country Club v. BrandIllinois Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Keirsey v. HirschNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Leadbetter v. PriceOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Polhamus v. RobertsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Albachten v. MILLER ET UXOregon Supreme Court · 1959

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bank of New Mexico v. RiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Casa El Sol-Acapulco, S.A. v. Fontenot, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1996
  3. United Properties Ltd. v. Walgreen Properties, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Master Builders, Inc. v. CabbellNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Geisdorf v. DoughtyUtah Supreme Court · 1998

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API