Economy Cover Corp. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Re, Judge:
The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs purposes, of certain merchandise *131exported from Hong Kong and Taiwan, and entered at the port of New York. The merchandise from Hong Kong is described as “plain polyethylene suit cowers,” and-that from Taiwan as “crystal transparent covers.” Both the suit covers, commonly known as overlap covers, and the transparent covers, known as shoulder covers, are plastic covers used as protective coverings for clothing. Since there is no genuine factual issue to be tried, the parties, pursuant to rule 8.2 of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Fabry Associates, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Necchi Sewing Machine Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
- Joanna Western Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
- Albert E. Price, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commercial Aluminum Cookware Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1996
- Nissho-Iwai American Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1986
- Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Apple Computer, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.