Legal Opinion

Deckers Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided December 15, 2005No. Slip Op. 05-159; Court 02-00674PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum & Order

AQUILINO, Senior Judge.

In Hebrew, Teva means Nature. In American, it can mean sandals under patent that have been produced in Hong Kong for import here, the tariff classification of three models of which, the Pretty Rugged Sport Sandal, the Terradactyl Sport Sandal, and the Aquadactyl Sport Sandal, is the basis of this test case within the meaning of USCIT Rule 84(b). Upon entry of those particular Teva ®s through the port of Los Angeles, California, the U.S. Customs Service, as it was then still known, classified them under heading 6404 (footwear with outer soles of rubber…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. United States v. MenascheSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Avia Group International, Inc., (Formerly Pensa, Inc.) v. L.A. Gear California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Deckers Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  2. Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2013
  3. Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2019
  4. Deckers Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007
  5. Roche Vitamins, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API