Legal Opinion
Apple Computer, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided October 19, 1990No. Court 86-01-00125PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RE, Chief Judge:
Pursuant to Rule 59(e) of the Rules of this Court, the defendant moves to alter or amend the judgment in Apple Computer, Inc. v. United States, 14 CIT-, Slip Op. 90-14 (Feb. 13, 1990).
In Apple Computer, the imported merchandise consisted of Apple x-y plotters and plotter pens. The plotters were classified by the Customs Service as “[djrafting and drawing machines,” under item 710.80, TSUS, and the plotter pens were classified as “[mjarking pens having a wick-like tip of felt or other material,” under item 760.15, TSUS.
Plaintiff protested these classifications, and contended…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frito-Lay of Puerto Rico, Inc. v. CañasDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
- Erickson Tool Company v. Balas Collet CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1967
- Erickson Tool Company v. Balas Collet CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Ray E. Friedman & Co. v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Economy Cover Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sabritas, S.A. de C.V. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1998
- Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Sumitronics Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995
- United States v. Great Am. Ins. Co. of NYUnited States Court of International Trade · 2012