Legal Opinion

Apple Computer, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided February 13, 1990No. Consolidated Court No. 86-01-00125Published

1Opinion of the Court

Re, Chief Judge:

The question presented in this case pertains to the proper classification, for customs duty purposes, of certain merchandise imported from Japan and described on the Customs invoices as “x-y plotters” and “plotter pen kits.”

The plotters entered at the port of Oakland, California, in 1983 and 1984, and were classified by the Customs Service as “ [djrafting * * * ma*78chines,” under item 710.80 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS), with duty assessed at the rate provided for at the time of entry. The plotter pens entered at the port of San Francisco, California, in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  3. Phone-Mate, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  4. C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
  5. Phone-Mate, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API