Legal Opinion

Fabry Associates, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided September 30, 1960No. C. D. 2203PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MollisoN, Judge:

Although the protest at bar is directed against the assessment of duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem on “bookshelves and all other items assessed at the same rates of duty,” it has been limited by counsel for the plaintiff to the items imported in sets or units and which are identified on the invoices covered by the entries involved as LS20, LS80, LS53,2, and 4.

Such merchandise was assessed with duty at the rate of 16% per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 52373 and T.D. 52476, for—

Manufactures of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Morimura Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  2. Necchi Sewing Machine Sales Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1952
  3. Decorative Imports v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. St. Francis Xavier Church v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Joanna Western Mills Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Furniture Import Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Economy Cover Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  4. Hurricane Import Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. Shelford, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API