Legal Opinion

Albert E. Price, Inc. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 3, 1973No. 5507, C.A.D. 1095PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AlmoND, Senior Judge.

This is an appeal by the importer from the decision and judgment of the United States Customs Court, 68 Cust. Ct. 50, C.D. 4334 (1972), wherein certain spice cabinets were held to have been properly classified under item 206.97 of the Tariff Schedules of the United States (TSUS) as household utensils of wood and assessed with a duty of 16% per centum ad valorem.

The involved merchandise consists of “Thoma-Wood Wall Spice Set wood cabinet with louver door hutch with two drawers at bottom.”

Appellant in its protest alleged that the merchandise in issue should have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sprouse Reitz & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
  2. Albert E. Price, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1972

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Karoware, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  2. Karoware, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  3. Porter v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  4. Economy Cover Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976
  5. Corning Glass Works v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API