Legal Opinion
Adams v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 13, 2001No. 96-93CPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BRUGGINK, Judge.
This is an action brought by United States Border Patrol Agents, pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219 (1994 & Supp. IV 1998). We previously held that plaintiffs in certain border patrol positions were entitled to overtime pay as a result of them wrongful classification as exempt from FLSA overtime provisions, 29 U.S.C. § 213(a). See Adams v. United States, 44 Fed.Cl. 772 (1999). Most remaining positions were found to be exempt. Id. Subsequent to the liability determination, plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment on various…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- District of Columbia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Angelo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Collier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.