Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 26, 2005No. 93-601 CPublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BUSH, Judge.

This matter comes before the court on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth herein, Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment on Counts I, IV and V is granted in part and denied in part. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or for Partial Summary Judgment on Counts I and IV-VI of Plaintiffs Amended Complaint is also granted in part and denied in part.

BACKGROUND

Transfer of Saint Elizabeths Hospital from the Federal Government to the Distñct of Columbia

For over 130 years, between 1855 and September 30, 1987, Saint Elizabeths Hospital (Hospital or…

2Cases cited110 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. South Carolina v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2017
  2. Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  3. Cooke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
  4. Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  5. Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API