Legal Opinion

Collier v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 6, 2003No. 02-948 CPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

This case involves a claim by Stanton E. Collier (Plaintiff), appearing pro se, that he is owed military pay because he was paid at a GS-14 level while performing the duties of a GS-15 position. Plaintiff advances three grounds for relief: (1) the Government breached an express or implied-in-fact contract established by Plaintiff’s performance plans; (2) Plaintiff suffered a Fifth Amendment taking because he was paid a GS-14 salary while performing the duties of a GS-15 position; and (3) he was denied back pay pursuant to the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Calvin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  2. Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Stanton E. Collier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  4. Refaei v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
  5. Piper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API