Collier v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAMICH, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
This case involves a claim by Stanton E. Collier (Plaintiff), appearing pro se, that he is owed military pay because he was paid at a GS-14 level while performing the duties of a GS-15 position. Plaintiff advances three grounds for relief: (1) the Government breached an express or implied-in-fact contract established by Plaintiff’s performance plans; (2) Plaintiff suffered a Fifth Amendment taking because he was paid a GS-14 salary while performing the duties of a GS-15 position; and (3) he was denied back pay pursuant to the Back Pay Act, 5 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Calvin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Seh Ahn Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Stanton E. Collier v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Refaei v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Piper v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.