Legal Opinion

Angelo v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided June 27, 2003No. Nos. 00-116 C, 00-1161 CPublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAMICH, Chief Judge.

I. Introduction

This Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) case involves overtime pay claims of some 90 Plaintiffs employed by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) or its subsidiary agency, the United States Border Patrol (Border Patrol). The Plaintiffs are generally divided into two groups: GS-9 Supervisory Detention Enforcement Officers (SDEOs) and GS-11 Detention Operations Supervisors (DOSs). The DOSs function as first-line supervisors to SDEOs and second-line supervisors to DEOs. This opinion addresses five discrete questions that the Court directed the…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. United States v. Nordic Village, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Romero v. Producers Dairy Foods, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2006
  2. Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
  3. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  4. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
  5. Christofferson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API