Legal Opinion

Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 21, 1994No. 94-067PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Nelson

This is an appeal from a Workers’ Compensation Court order granting the defendants/respondents summary judgment and its order denying plaintiffs/appellants partial summary judgment. We reverse and remand for a calculation of benefits consistent with this opinion.

The issue on appeal is whether the District Court erred in granting summary judgment to the defendants/respondents and denying the partial summary judgment motion of the plaintiffs/appellants. The underlying issue is whether the statutes at issue which set the maximum rate for workers’ compensation benefits at $299 for the periods…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Montana Ass'n of Underwriters v. State Ex Rel. Department of AdministrationMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Murer v. Montana State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Lund v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund/Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Stuber v. Moodie ImplementMontana Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Clarke v. MasseyMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wunderlich v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Stavenjord v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Connery v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1998

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API