Legal Opinion

Murer v. Montana State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1993No. 92-479PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McDONOUGH

This is an appeal from an order of the Workers’ Compensation Court. We affirm.

The issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in denying class certification to the claimants.

Claimants are nine workers injured between July 1,1987 and June 30, 1991. These claimants, and the alleged class they represent, are entitled to various benefits: maximum total disability, partial disability, rehabilitation and/or death benefits. For maximum benefits for total disability the respondents (insurers) have paid $299, claiming there is a permanent “cap” on such benefits under statutory provisions…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Robert La Mar v. H & B Novelty & Loan Company, Ronald J. Kinsling v. Allegheny AirlinesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Dolores DONINGER Et Al., Appellants, v. PACIFIC NORTHWEST BELL, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Madeline Johnson, Etc. v. The City of Opelousas, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  4. Harriss v. Pan American World Airways, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1977
  5. Mr. And Mrs. Fred Ray Boggs, and on Behalf of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. Alto Trailer Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Delvin C. Payton v. County of KaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Chipman v. Northwest Healthcare Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Diaz v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMontana Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Fernandez v. Takata Seat Belts, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2005
  5. McDonald v. WashingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1993

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API