Legal Opinion
Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund
Montana Supreme Court
Decided June 23, 1997No. 95-542PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Trieweiler
The claimants, Jack Murer, Jay Harbrige, Keith Mordja, Susan Vernon, Bruce Nelson, Steve Prickett, and James Brown, filed a petition for benefits in the Workers’ Compensation Court for the State *214of Montana. On November 20, 1995, the Workers’ Compensation Court entered its final judgment granting in part and denying in part the benefits and fees which were sought. Claimants appeal and the respondent, State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund, cross-appeals. We affirm in part and reverse in part the judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court, and remand to that court for further proceedings…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Boeing Co. v. Van GemertSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Central Railroad & Banking Co. of Ga. v. PettusSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Mountain West Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. HallMontana Supreme Court · 2001
- Wiard v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 2003
- Ferguson v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 2008
- Rausch v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2002
- Government Employees Ins. Co. v. CapulliCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.