Legal Opinion

Connery v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1998No. 97-630PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Turnage

¶ 1 In this action, the Workers’ Compensation Court declared unconstitutional the benefit reduction provision of § 39-71-416(1), MCA. The employer’s insurer, Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (Liberty), appeals. We affirm.

¶2 The issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in ruling that § 39-71-416(1), MCA, violates a worker’s right to full legal redress under Article II, Section 16 of the Montana Constitution.

¶3 Colleen Connery was injured on December 10, 1995, when a co-employee, Mark Roy, collided with her on the Big Mountain Ski Hill. The injury occurred within the course…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stratemeyer v. Lincoln CountyMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Francetich v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Watson v. SeekinsMontana Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Connery v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp.Montana Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Gilkey v. SchweitzerMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Thayer v. Uninsured Employers' FundMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re the Estate of LandeMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Belgrade Elementary & High School District No. 44 v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. ThompsonMontana Supreme Court · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API