Legal Opinion

Wunderlich v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1995No. 94-486PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

R. Kim Wunderlich (Wunderlich) appeals from the findings, conclusions, and judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Court. The court denied Wunderlich’s claim for permanent partial disability benefits under § 39-71-703, MCA (1985), and his claims for a penalty and attorney fees based on Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company’s (Lumbermens) unreasonably delayed acceptance of his occupational disease claim. We affirm.

The Workers’ Compensation Court consolidated Wunderlich’s Workers’ Compensation Act and Occupational Disease Act claims for trial. For purposes of clarity, we address Wunderlich’s claim…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Buckman v. Montana Deaconess HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Burns v. Plum Creek Timber Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State Ex Rel. Uninsured Employers' Fund v. HuntMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Miller v. FrasureMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Smith v. United Parcel ServiceMontana Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. S.L.H. v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Fillinger v. Northwestern Agency, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Total Mechanical Heating & Air Conditioning v. EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS DIVISIONMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Matter of the Wage Claim of Ramsey v. Yellowstone Neurosurgical Associates, P.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API