Legal Opinion

Lund v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance Fund/Garden City Plumbing & Heating, Inc.

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1994No. 93-286PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gray

The issue before us is whether the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in concluding that, pursuant to § 39-71-709, MCA (1985), claimant could withdraw his election to proceed under § 39-71-703, MCA (1985), and seek benefits under §§ 39-71-705 through 39-71-708, MCA (1985). We hold that the court did not err and, therefore, affirm its grant of claimant’s motion for summary judgment.

The relevant facts are uncontested. Claimant Timothy Lund (Lund) was employed by Garden City Plumbing and Heating, Inc. (Garden City) on July 8,1986, when he was injured in the course and scope of his employment.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Steer, Inc. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Minnie v. City of RoundupMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Brault v. SmithMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  4. GBN, INC. v. Montana Dept. of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Smith v. SchweigertMontana Supreme Court · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Lorang v. Fortis InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Wray v. State Compensation Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Goble v. Montana State FundMontana Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Murer v. State Compensation Mutual Insurance FundMontana Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API