Legal Opinion
Royal Thai Government v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 1, 2006No. 2005-1117PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
United States Steel Corporation (“U.S.Steel”) and the United States separately challenge different aspects of the United States Court of International Trade’s decision in favor of the Royal Thai Government (“RTG”) and Sahaviriya Steel Industries Public Company Limited (“SSI”) that, on remand to the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”), resulted in a determination that no countervailable subsidies were provided to the production or exportation of certain hot-rolled carbon steel flat products from Thailand. See Royal Thai Gov’t v. United States, 341 F.Supp.2d…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Suramerica de Aleaciones Laminadas, C.A. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Ppg Industries, Inc. v. The United States, and Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
- Altx, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Parkdale International v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Royal Thai Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Nakornthai Strip Mill Public Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2008
- Borusan Mannesmann Boru Sanayi ve Ticaret A.S. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2015
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.