Legal Opinion
Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided April 7, 2006No. Consol. 05-00324PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
POGUE, Judge.
This case presents two key questions: First, whether domestic law authorizes the Government of Canada and/or its exporters to challenge in this court the administration of the United States’ trade laws, particularly the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act of 2000, Pub.L. No. 106-387, § 1003, 114 Stat. 1549, 1623 (2000) codified at 19 U.S.C. § 1675c (the “Byrd Amendment”). The United States Bureau of Customs and Border Protection (“Customs” or “Defendant” or “Commissioner”), 1 relying on'the Byrd Amendment, distributes to domestic producers who are competitors of the…
2Cases cited179 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
174 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Ontario Forest Industries Assoc v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Furniture Brands International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2011
- Canadian Lumber Trade Alliance v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
- Tembec, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.