Legal Opinion
Ppg Industries, Inc. v. The United States, and Vitro Flotado, S.A. And Vidrio Plano De Mexico, S.A.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided November 3, 1992No. 89-1520PublishedCited by 72 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
PPG Industries, Inc. appeals the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade holding (1) that substantial evidence supports the United States International Trade Administration’s (ITA) determination that the parties to the suspension agreement did not receive prohibited countervailable Certificados de Devolución de Impuesto (CEDIs) during the period of review, (2) that Fidelicomiso para la Cober-tura de Riesgos Cambiarios (FICORCA) is not a countervailable program because its benefits are not provided to a specific enterprise or industry, or group of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Hormel v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Fujitsu General Limited v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Norsk Hydro Canada, Inc. v. United States, and U.S. Magnesium LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Nation Ford Chemical Company v. United States, and Yude Chemical Company, Zhenxing Chemical Industry Company and Pht International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Wheatland Tube Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.